Info

Community provocateur

“The reasonable man adapts himself to the conditions that surround him… The unreasonable man adapts surrounding conditions to himself… All progress depends on the unreasonable man.” -George Bernard Shaw

Nothing exposes weakness like being an entrepreneur. After all, it is hard not to question ourselves and our endeavors in light of short falls and failings.

I would like to suggest that those who have more experience failing may be the ones who are more likely to succeed at changing the world. I am talking about the misfits.

Misfits are those of us who have experienced such identity-shaking rejection that the only label that fits is that we don’t…fit.

The only option misfits have left to ensure their own survival is to instead change the world to fit who they are instead. They refuse to be reasonable and accept the world’s terms, instead insisting on their own ways. And that makes all the difference.

Misfits and broken people are my favorite entrepreneurs. If for no other reason than they frequently have no better option, making them exceptionally dedicated!

More than being odd, being a misfit as an entrepreneur means standing against the status quo and pursuing a different, better way. But being an entrepreneur who also happens to be a misfit comes with a super power.

Misfits can take what is broken and do something great with it when most would dismiss or discard. This is an inordinately valuable skill for entrepreneurs because the world can be disjointed and broken, and our endeavors are acts of justice and healing.

Every decent entrepreneur will be considered unreasonable in the process of doing things differently. That’s the way of things, and it is wonderful.

For those who don’t fit in but find hope in the startup scene, I urge you to continue on. Practice surviving and adapting, but always protect your most important values. Those values that you will bring to the world one way or another.

You matter. With a bit of cleverness, your persistence while embracing who you are will change your circumstances before you have to change yourself. And when no one around you understands what you are doing, just remember:

We are the misfits. We will change the world.

What has been will be again,
what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.
Solomon, King of Israel, circa 950 B.C.

Crowdfunding is not a new kind of investing. It is only a series of technology-enhanced approaches to known investing behaviors to be inclusive of Greater Numbers of Smaller Checks.

I predict that the winners in crowdfunding will replicate known early stage investing behavior and modernize what we have already seen in early stage investing. Aspiring crowdfunding startups should learn from existing investment behaviors and create systems that empower an extension of those behaviors to underserved populations.

I side with King Solomon when I suggest that crowdfunding will create nothing new. Here are the categories of known investment behavior that will be modernized by the impact of Greater Numbers of Smaller Checks.

Crowdfunding the Modern Telethon

When we think of a successful crowdfunding a project or business today, we look to the model pioneered by Kickstarter. This approach is essentially fundraising by donation. Rewards in the form of smiles, tokens of gratitude, and pre-orders. It is the same fundraising model used by radio stations and TV preachers around the world. Kickstarter has modernized the telethon, a proven model for fundraising used for generations.

I am going to go out on a limb and say that Kickstarter is already the winner in this category. Indiegogo picks up the scraps (millions of dollars of scraps), but I expect they will be a contender in other crowdfunding verticals as they look for a leading position.

Crowdfunding the Modern Lender

Prosper and Lending Club are the winners in peer-to-peer lending, but allow me to abstract them from this crowdfunding discussion. Both companies cater exclusively to individual borrowers (technically, you can borrow for personal expenses as you start a business) and neither are for businesses as the borrowers.

That leaves the space wide open for the mordernizing of lending. SoMoLend is the up- and-comer in this crowdfunding vertical. The CEO Candace Klein is one of the Jobs Act authors, and she is very well connected in the industry. SoMoLend is poised to lead with debt- based crowdfunding when the Jobs Act is enacted and is already accepting loan applications from businesses with banks as the lenders.

Until the Jobs Act is enacted, it is still anyone’s game to win. Lending is a very well established investment behavior, so this vertical could be very exciting.

Crowdfunding the Modern Angel Group

Didn’t you know? Angel investing in groups is crowdfunding, which has been common for decades. Need a million dollars and $50,000 is the best you can get from your uncle’s golf buddy? Pitch to the whole country club for 19 of his other friends to match him. Boom. Crowdfunding.

There is a widespread rumor that once non- accredited individuals can invest directly into startup companies, there will be a flood of capital from the unwashed masses, who are supposedly starving for high-risk, high-return investments. This misconception is likely caused by the high correlation of people who know what an accredited investor is and those who try to raise money from them (esp. for crowdfunding startup concepts). Alas, if the behavior of experienced accredited investors is any indication, this is going to be an uphill battle to introduce this new kind of investment behavior to the masses in a widespread way. Niche players, beware.

Angel investing in groups has all sorts of social behaviors attached to the process that can be replicated or mitigated by a crowdfunding platform. There is definitely room for someone to empower unaccredited individuals the way that angel group managers empower their own members, accommodating for the scale of Greater Numbers of Smaller Checks.

In this category, I say watch out for YC’s own FundersClub. They understand the problem and are attacking it well, as far as I can tell. Arguably, FundersClub is operating closely to a fund with the individuals as Limited Partners. But that argument only holds if FunderClub is committed to adding value to its companies. Which brings us to our next vertical.

Crowdfunding as the Modern VC Firm

What if you could raise money from the public like a venture capitalist raises and invest a fund on behalf of limited partners? The key differentiator in this crowdfunding vertical is the adding of value to the capital of the crowd. I am an advisor to Revenue Trades, who is taking on this vertical, so I will not comment on their potential as a leader of it.

Crowdfunding that incorporates a value-add component may have an advantage over dumb money crowdfunding approaches. The potential of someone to add value and thus validate an investor’s decision is a different way of compelling investors than letting the startup speak on its own. This vertical of crowdfunding has the greatest potential to disrupt the venture capital industry, especially if Limited Partners can include Greater Numbers of Smaller Checks alongside traditional institutional investors.

Crowdfunding Complex Financial Instruments

When crowdfunding matures, we will begin to see specializing of financial arrangements that drive particular performance metrics by the business or meet specific return expectations by investors. These financial innovations are only viable once the standard expectation of businesses and investors are being met. New innovations will serve new expectations, and the crowdfunding economy will blossom. The leader in this vertical would be the equivalent of the Goldman-Sachs of crowdfunding, a beautiful and frightening idea to ponder.

That is, unless we as the startup community manage to screw it up first. Responsible development and execution of financial innovation that redefines the entire funding landscape? Well, I guess that would be something new.